Is social media harmful for kids? Meta and YouTube face trial after TikTok settles suit

The TikTok logo is displayed at a the social media company’s office in Culver City.

(Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Sonja Sharp

Staff Writer

Jan. 27, 2026

10:09 AM PT

5 min

Click here to listen to this article

Share via

Close extra sharing options

Email Facebook X LinkedIn Threads Reddit WhatsApp

Copy Link URL

Copied!

0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

Jury selection was set to begin in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday in a lawsuit that alleges social media companies caused harm to children.

TikTok and Snap reached settlements before the civil trial, but Meta and YouTube appear set to proceed.

The L.A. case is a bellwether for at least 2,500 similar lawsuits pending in state and federal court.

TikTok agreed to settle the first in a series of closely-watched product liability cases Monday, bowing out on the eve of a landmark trial that could upend how social media giants engage their youngest users and leave tech titans on the hook for billions in damages.

The settlement was reached as jury selection was set to begin in Los Angeles Superior Court Tuesday and comes a week after Snap reached a deal with the same plaintiff, a Chico, California, woman who said she became addicted to social media starting in elementary school.

“This settlement should come as no surprise because that damning evidence is just the tip of the iceberg,” said Sacha Haworth, executive director of The Tech Oversight Project, an industry watchdog. “This was only the first case — there are hundreds of parents and school districts in the social media addiction trials that start today, and sadly, new families every day who are speaking out and bringing Big Tech to court for its deliberately harmful products.”

TikTok did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

“The Parties are pleased to have been able to resolve this matter in an amicable manner,” Snap spokeswoman Monique Bellamy said of the settlement.

LOS ANGELES, CA - DECEMBER 09: The Children's Hospital Los Angeles is seen from Sunset Blvd. in on Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2020 in Los Angeles, CA. A child died this week from the coronavirus-linked multi-system inflammatory syndrome, known as LIS-C, the first such reported death in Los Angeles County. The patient, was at Children's Hospital Los Angeles had a "complex pre-existing cardiac condition" and died from complications tied to MIS-C. (Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)

California

Justice Department drops demand for records naming transgender kids treated at Children’s Hospital L.A.

The U.S. Department of Justice has agreed to stop seeking medical records that personally identify young patients who received gender-affirming care from Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, according to court records.

Jan. 23, 2026

The remaining defendants, Instagram‘s parent company Meta and Google’s YouTube still face claims their products are “defective” and designed to keep children hooked to products its makers know are harmful.

Those same arguments are at the heart of at least 2,500 cases currently pending together in state and federal court. The Los Angeles trial is among a handful of so-called “bellwethers” meant to clarify the uncharted legal terrain.

Social media companies they are protected by the First Amendment and by Section 230, a decades-old law that shields internet companies from liability for what users produce and share on their platforms.

Attorneys for the Chico plaintiff, referred to in court documents as K.G.M, say the apps were built and refined to snare youngsters and keep them on the platforms without regard for dangers the companies knew lurked there, from sexual predation to bullying to promotion of self-harm and even suicide.

Jurors will be asked to weigh whether those dangers are incidental or inherent, and if social media companies can be held responsible for the harm families say flowed from their children’s feeds.

The trial comes at a moment when public opinion around social media has soured, with a growing sentiment among parents, mental health professionals, lawmakers and even children themselves that the apps do more harm than good.

Phones are now banned in California public school classrooms. Many private schools impose strict rules around when and how social media can penetrate the student body.

In study after study, pluralities of young users — among them the youngest of “Anxious Generation” Zoomers and the oldest Gen Alpha’s iPad kids — now say they spend too much time on the apps. A disputed but growing body of research suggests some portion are addicted.

According to a study last spring by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, roughly half of teens say social media is bad for people their age, that it interferes with their sleep and hurts their productivity. Almost a quarter say it’s brought down their grades. One in five say its hurt their mental health.

Law enforcement officers stand amid tear gas at the scene of a reported shooting Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Adam Gray)

Voices

Letters to the Editor: Trump’s Insurrection Act threat is the fear-based behavior of a bully

‘This is the behavior of a bully — someone who, out of fear, targets those who can’t easily fight back. Worse, in a supposed world leader, it’s also the behavior of a dictator,’ writes an L.A. Times reader.

Jan. 17, 2026

Experts say social media has also helped drive the spike in suicides among teen girls, and a post-pandemic surge in eating disorders.

Boosters of the litigation compare their quest to the fight against big tobacco and the opioid-maker Purdue.

“This is the beginning of the trial of our generation,” Haworth said.

But the gulf between public opinion and civil culpability is vast, attorneys for the platforms say. Social media addiction is not a formal clinical diagnosis, and proving it exists, and that the companies bear responsibility for it, will be an uphill battle.

Lawyers for YouTube have sought to further complicate the picture by claiming their video-sharing site is not social media at all, and cannot be lumped in with the likes of Instagram and TikTok.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs say such distinctions are ephemeral, pointing out that YouTube has by far the youngest group of users, many of whom say the platform was an on-ramp to the world of social media.

“I am equally shocked ... by the internal documents that I have seen from all four of these defendants regarding their knowing decision to addict kids to a platform knowing it would be bad for them,” said attorney Matthew Bergman of the Social Media Victims Law Center. “To me they are all outrageous in their decision to elevate their profits over the safety of kids.”